Skip to content

Burn Notice

February 8, 2011

Well, that pretty much sucked. I watched the game after work so I was kind of tired, but there wasn’t a whole lot that really kept me awake. Playing some of the missed opportunities back in my head when I go to sleep later might keep me up, but then again, visualizing the powerplays ought to counteract that. Well, since the game was painful enough, maybe I should just try to keep my word count down today to spare you all further agony. (Yeah, like that’s gonna happen)

First period SOG, Hawks =3, Flamers=10. That tells you a lot right there. Overall, there were some things I liked that I saw from the Hawks here, but I will lump those in together later. I don’t think the Hawks got outworked, but they just could not seem to really generate the kind of pressure needed to get shots on net. In the first two periods overall, the Defense made some really, really good open ice hits. But, with just five minutes to go. One of the Flames younger players set up Backland, who was left completely untouched in blown coverage, with a great pass that he buried pretty decisively. Give the Flames credit, this was a sweet play on their part.

Second period, SOG were dead even at 11 apiece and the Hawks finally dented the net 6 minutes in after catching the Flames in a line change. I still don’t know exactly how it happened, but Toews took a clearing pass up the left boards near center ice, had to pull it back but then manages to carry into the offensive zone. After the puck got down low behind the net, the Flames looked like they were in a four man PK box around the net and they left Kane completely open in the slot to receive a Toews pass that he then buried.

Third period, Hawks actually edged the Flames a little in SOG, but it was for naught as once again the Flames capitalized on blown coverage. My notes say Brouwer was the closest guy both times. Near the very end of the game, the Hawks seemed to be finding some momentum (kinda makes you wonder where it was earlier) but with just about a minute and a half to go, Seabrook pretty much negates what had been a good game for him by yapping at a ref and getting sent off for unsportsmanlike conduct. This set the stage for Rene Bourque to get of the schnide with an empty netter. Note from coach Rene: you still can’t go back to the second line yet.

So what, you might ask, was positive in that debacle? Not much cept for some little things. For maybe the first time this season, I saw players consistently standing up for each other. No fights, no major retaliations, but nonetheless there were guys after the whistle coming in to give some hard shoves and show a little emotion. From the defense, there were some real nice open ice hits. Up until the end, I thought Seabrook actually  had a pretty strong game. Couple of big hits, decent puck decisions and at least one really nice diving effort to interrupt a break away. Leddy looked okay and Boynton was…..Boynton. On the downside, they just could not put any sustained pressure on Kipper. Yeah, they created some goalmouth scrambles but not enough to eventually force a goal. I’m getting tired of hearing Foley or his sidekick say, “And Hossa couldn’t elevate the puck over the stacked pads. ” It’s another close game loss and they have got to find a way to start winning these. When they break open a game, everybody and their brother scores; when it’s a tight game though, they just look controlled.

Something I think the Hawks should do is watch tape of Iginila’s line to see what is possible with a three man weave. This line has gotten VERY good at this. For the most part, I thought the Hawks D handled it really well, however, the forwards on the back check frequently got pulled way out of position leaving plenty of time and space for the Flames. The Flames are not yet a good team, but with the big Sutter gone they seem a hell of a lot happier and have played much better hockey as of late. For the Hawks, I hate to say it, but they look to be in schnide mode. Not playing horribly bad, but not good enough to win games they clearly have a chance in. A win in Edmonton is not going to change their lot in the standings right now, but they need a slump buster date and need to vent some frustration. Let’s hope they don’t take this next game for granted.

Advertisement
10 Comments leave one →
  1. GuitarMan permalink
    February 8, 2011 2:35 am

    No excuses on this one. Give credit to the Flames for a well played game.

    Vegas is right that the Hawks need to watch a tape of tonight’s game. Besides learning the weave from the Flames, maybe they can:

    - Learn how to run an aggressive PK
    - Learn how to win a draw
    - Learn how to win a game in the third
    - Realize that Boynton needs to go away
    - See that Crawford is better than Turco

    Hossa has elevated neither the puck nor his game since the first few weeks of the season. If he keeps up this pace he may find himself standing on the ice next to Huet in the Swiss League.

    A third loss to Edmonton this season could just about sink this ship. Apparently the Preds took the Oilers for granted tonight…

    • vegashawksfan permalink
      February 8, 2011 10:18 am

      Foley talked a bit last night about how the departure of the GM Sutter was like a dark cloud lifting and how the team suddenly started to play much better. Looking at the Hawks, we know the talent is there but on any given night something is missing. Your list here Guitar is exactly what was missing tonight and though it’s not the same list every night, it is always some variation of not enough little things. I said this the other night and I’m afraid it’s still true; the game against the Nucks was probably about the best the Hawks can do. At this point in the season, the games only get tighter and tighter and the players should be getting more hungry. I don’t think the Hawks are mailing it in, but a lot of teams they face seem to have them figured out.

  2. BeaverWarrior permalink
    February 8, 2011 5:54 am

    Not much to like about this game except for the Captain of the team and the rookie goalie. Someone remind again me why the Hawks are paying 5.25 M to #81. Trade deadline is 20 days away and I fear the end of the line for this season will be here before that.

    BW

  3. djd permalink
    February 8, 2011 11:02 am

    Not sure what game I was watching, but the ‘hawks looked beaten from the get-go. Looks like they came out and expected an MMA showdown and didn’t get it. The rest was a sleepwalk for most of the game. Calgary played well and the ‘hawks were one and done in the offensive zone for most of the night. Too much perimeter play, no pucks to the net, no net presence, and no sustained pressure. Did Kiprusoff have make a noteworthy save? Pathetic, is what that effort was and they deserve to be where they are in the standings. Toews must be livid.

    Better not take the Oilers lightly—as Nashville found out. These kids are playing carefree and having fun doing it.

  4. February 8, 2011 4:33 pm

    Everyone seems to be on the same page here.

    Great post Vegas. I love the list Guitar and I couldn’t have put it any better. One of my big gripes right now is playing Boynton over Hendry. I just do not get it.

    Why, and how, with that talent on the PP are they constantly standing still? Agreed, the PP needs more aggression, though remember that they do have the best in the league.

    Toews continues to be the guy trying to lift this team up. It is far beyond time that the other overtly paid players do the same. Campbell might have gotten better on the D, but he is playing really safe, and I am not sure the Hawks need that right now. I am about ready to just admit that Kane will not be the 100 point guy that the Hawks needed this year. His ankle injury and a lack of focus off the ice seem to have tarnished his season.

    If Hossa can not score a damn goal in the next game or so I might lose my mind. If he is trade worthy, which I doubt, I might be sending him packing.

    Sharp seems to be in a rut. Bickell has simmered a bit off of his hot streak (he might have a nagging injury or something, because his physical game has disappeared).

    The issue for the Hawks is the core and not the replacements who filled in the roster. If they can not live up to those big contracts, then the Hawks are lost up the creek.

    The best I can say right now is that last night was not a terrible outing. It was just a lackluster outing. Boring is the perfect word. The did not suck, and I haven’t seen them play that bad in a long time. Things are just not bouncing their way, and they have too much inconsistency.

    Heres to the Hawks figuring their stuff out.

  5. BlkHawk11 permalink
    February 9, 2011 8:07 am

    Good post and comments by everyone and your list is soooo accurate, Guitar in every respect. Hossa does not fit along with Boynton in his role to say the least and Q is either short-sighted as to his overall coaching of the Hawks all season long….way too much inconsistency and the players lack of dedicated effort spells sheer disaster along with embarrasment to the team as a whole as well as the fan base,
    Toews has been the only player that is playing with heart for his team and he cannot carry them all on his own.
    Either they get the lead out now or face the inevitable….Bowman and Rocky will suffer the consequences come next season when attendance numbers began to fall drastically and the marketing value disappears.

  6. vegashawksfan permalink
    February 9, 2011 9:16 am

    Q allegedly puts the boys through a bag skate. If they don’t respond tonight, things are in very bad shape.

    • February 9, 2011 2:51 pm

      Losing to the Oilers would surely be a sign of terrible things. I am curious how much not making the playoffs this year would disrupt the administration’s goals.
      Are they willing to let that happen?
      What is the cost they would be willing to pay in order not let that happen?

      • djd permalink
        February 9, 2011 4:34 pm

        With this “appearance is everything” administration I think its’ a safe bet that some changes will be made—if only for the cosmetic impact. Trade winds are picking up, me thinks.

      • BeaverWarrior permalink
        February 9, 2011 9:53 pm

        The trade winds just swept Skille away.

        BW

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.